Wednesday-
*Girls separated laundry
*Started out with bird watching. Jenna and I read from the bird book (and she wanted me to look up what "hulled" means) a bit as we watched. We noticed things about the Junco, looked at a ruler to check and see if our birds were matching up to the sizes listed (concluded our birds would only meet the size estimates if you measured from the tips of their tails), and oohed and aahed over our red-bellied woodpecker (determined she was a female). I noted that we don't have quite the variety of birds at our front feeder (but our view is so super, amazingly close) as we did in the backyard. Jenna wondered why. Jenna and Caroline both filled out their bird sheets.

*Kids took care of the chickens and played outside on the rope swing and in the snowflakes. I gave them warm tea when they came in. :) They also dumped the ashes. Why do I count this as part of our day that's worth recording? Because I agree with Renee Tougas at FIMBY:
Involving children in home life, not just involving them but depending on them, at age appropriate levels for pet and animal care, cleaning, laundry, chopping wood, cooking meals - good old-fashioned chores - develops self-discipline.
*Deskwork- 2 math review pages for Jenna while Caroline read a Bob book to Lambie.
*Jenna dictated Chapter 1 of a story to me: Sunny Bun Buns the Adventures of a Chicken (inspired by a book the three of us loved: Louise: The Adventures of a Chicken.
*Caroline dictated her to me about the adventures of Rosie the Chicken.
*We watched a couple of Cornell birdwatching videos that were sent to my email. Learned that the Junco looks different based on what part of the country he lives in (we noticed we have two different colored varieties). Also got excited about trying the new Cornell bird identifying app, Merlin.
* Jenna asked if she could try adding an embroidery braid to Caroline's hair (I initially balked at doing this for project time, but see the value in letting them explore things that aren't "academic."). She watched the video several times, tried it on Caroline first and then tried it on me. She asked me to read Gulliver's Travels (an annotated version Bryan found for her at the library-she's been reading it on her own, but she loves it so much, she wanted Caroline and I to get to read it too). Caroline got in my lap to listen and sucked her thumb.
*Clean-up
*Girls played
*Ate lunch around 1:00 and I read more of Gulliver. I got out the map so we could see where Gulliver went.
A bit from FIMBY I found that summarizes SO WELL the importance of exploring interests outside the typical academic realm:
When children become a young adults, after a childhood of creativity, exploration, and play, "applying themselves" looks like a whole lot of intense study into things adults might question as valuable or worthy.
You've got to kind of expect this, especially after you've given young children time to develop interests, and don't box them into subjects. School subjects are constructs, "real" in name only.
Adults don't go through life thinking of their days and activities in terms of "now I'm doing math, now I'm studying history, now I'm having phys ed." No, they balance the checkbook, read for the pleasure of it and to learn about something they're interested in, and work out because it feels good.
Even so, when well meaning adults see young adult students spending heaps of self-directed time on things that don't easily quantify as "American History, Chemistry, or English" they get a little panicky. What about the success track as laid out above?
(Perhaps at this point I could direct you to a different success track. Let's say the story of Steve Jobs who spent heaps of his young adulthood "playing" with electronics.)
Here's the rub. It's hard for people to understand when another person, child or adult, is invested in and personally driven to do something they themselves don't value, or can't see as valuable in society.
And yet these outliers, these people who pour energies into solving problems other people didn't even know existed or make art that modern day sensibilities don't get, these are the very people, all through history, who are society's movers and shakers.
Even if people question the assumption that the conveyer belt education system is "the track to success" (success by who's standards? by what measures?) they assauge that cognitive dissonance with the belief that by conforming to the system you at least learn self-discipline.
My question is: Do you learn self discipline with compulsory education?















